by Mikey Boy
Thunkd wrote:
dond80 wrote:
Well, ironically enough, the idea in your above post has its roots in what the OP said, but you didn't use his existing idea in a novel way- you just sarcastically repeated them as though you didn't even read his OP. :shake:
I rely on the intelligence of my readers to be able to infer the subtext. When that fails I explain it explicitly.
To clarify, my original post was sarcasm from which you were supposed to realize I disagreed with his point of view. I then elaborated in subsequent posts. And now I'm explaining myself explicitly.
You flatter yourself. There's subtext, and then there's "stuff that was in my head when I was typing, but wasn't in any way communicated by what I wrote."