by JonBen
MisterG wrote:
It doesn't need to say it; it's self-evident from the iconography.
I'm not sure why you would say that. There are many cases that would be equally "self-evident" and they explicitly state that the monument also counts. The lack of such a statement in this case raises this question which I think is perfectly legitimate. For example, look at the monument below this one in the rules, the clear iconography in this case did not prevent them from writing "This monument counts, too".